Birth Control And Abortion
Life begins at
fertilization
(conception), that moment when a sperm
joins with an ovum (egg) to form one
cell called a zygote. The
characteristics of this new person, such
as sex, eye and hair color,
intelligence, etc. are determined as he
or she inherits 23 chromosomes from each
parent at fertilization. This tiny child
then travels down the Fallopian tube
into the uterus. The new human implants
herself in the rich lining of the uterus
and begins to draw nourishment. This
process takes approximately 5 to 10 days
to complete.
“Reproductive
rights” advocates
try to confuse the issue by redefining
that fact of when life begins. They
often propose that a pregnancy does not
begin until implantation, not
fertilization, and therefore argue that
many birth control methods we call
abortifacient aren’t since they act
before implantation, before life, they
say, exists. But according to medical
texts and agreed upon by medical and
biological professionals, “life begins
at fertilization.”
Contraceptives vs.
Abortifacients 
A distinction exists between
contraceptive birth control and
abortifacient birth control.
Contraceptives
include the
so-called barrier methods: the condom,
diaphragm, cervical cap, and anti-sperm
methods such as the sponge, jellies,
foams and creams. These methods prevent
sperm from fertilizing an egg.
Abortifacients work
after
fertilization (conception) by killing
the newly conceived human at least some
of the time. These include oral
contraceptives (the Pill), IUD,
Norplant, Depo-Provera, Emergency
Contraception (the “Morning After Pill”),
and anti-fertility vaccines.
Although 1.6 million surgical
abortions take place each year in the
U.S., Dr. Bogomir Kuhar, a pharmacist
concerned about chemical abortion, has
calculated that in combining all forms
of induced abortion: the IUD,
Depo-Provera, Norplant, surgical and the
Pill (and injectables, implants, and
oral products that work in a similar
fashion), between 9.6 and 13.5 million
young lives are terminated in the U.S.
alone each year.1
Pro-abortion organizations readily
admit the early abortion potential of
these methods. In February 1992, writing
in opposition to a Louisiana law banning
abortion, Ruth Colker, a Tulane Law
School professor, wrote, “Because
nearly all birth control devices, except
the diaphragm and condom, operate
between the time of conception...and
implantation…, the statute would
appear to ban most contraceptives.”2
The Pill
The
Pill is taken orally, usually
every day. There are two kinds of Pills.
The “combined Pill” contains both
estrogen and progestin. The second type
is a progestin-only Pill sometimes
called the “mini-pill.” Both kinds
have three ways of working:
1—they prevent ovulation by
suppressing the part of the brain which
signals for ovulation to begin.
2—they change the lining of the
cervix to make it more difficult for
sperm to pass through, or
3—they prevent implantation of a
newly conceived human life on the lining
of the womb.3
Two other factors in a woman’s
fertility may be affected by the Pill as
well by:
4—lowering the efficiency with
which the Fallopian tubes propel eggs or
a newly conceived human (embryo) from
the ovaries toward the uterus. This can
cause the embryo not to reach the uterus
in time to implant successfully.4
5—affecting the corpus luteum (a
gland that controls the woman’s cycle
and normally functions long enough to
give an embryo time to implant and for
the placenta to begin to support a
pregnancy), causing it to allow the
lining of the uterus to be shed before
the embryo can successfully implant.5
The first two actions are
contraceptive in nature; the last three
cause abortions. Dr. J. Richard Crout,
director of the Bureau of Drugs of the
Food and Drug Administration (FDA),
concerning the “combination pills”
has explained that, “fundamentally,
these pills take over the menstrual
cycle from the normal endocrine
mechanisms. And in doing so they inhibit
ovulation and change the characteristics
of the uterus so that it is not
receptive to a fertilized egg [embryo].”6 The action of the progestin-only
Pill (“mini-pill”) appears to be
even more consistently abortifacient.
When Syntex Laboratories, Inc. released
the progestin-only Pill which it had
developed, spokesman Russ Wilks
announced that it did not “interfere
with ovulation...It seems to affect the
endometrium [the lining of the uterus]
so that a fertilized egg [embryo] cannot
be implanted.”7 The
FDA’s detailed patient labeling for
oral contraceptives (sic) says, “progestin-only
contraceptives (sic) are known to alter
the cervical mucus, exert a progestinal
effect on the endrometrium, interfering
with implantation, and, in some
patients, suppress ovulation.”8
It is estimated that some forms of
the Pill of today cause abortions up to
50% of the time.9 Emory
University’s Contraceptive
Technology published that the
“mini-pills”
allow ovulation to take place 40 to 60%
of the time.
IUD
The IUD, (intra-uterine device), is
an object that is placed inside the
uterus (womb) by a physician. When in
place, it and the chemical it contains
alters the fluids in the womb and the
lining of the womb. The presence of the
IUD irritates the lings, causing any
newly conceived child to be unable to
implant. The baby dies and passes out of
the mother’s body unnoticed. According
to the American Medical Association
(AMA) Committee on Human Reproduction,
“the action of the IUDs would seem
to be a simple local phenomenon. That
these devices prevent nidation
[implantation] of an already fertilized
ovum [embryo] has been accepted as the
most likely mechanism of the action.”10
In an exhaustive survey of over 400
articles on the subject, Dr. Thomas W.
Hilgers concluded,
“...the conclusion is that the primary
action of the IUD must be classed as
abortifacient.”11
Depo-Provera
Depo-Provera is a long-acting,
man-made hormone in an injection
received every three months. It has been
available in some parts of the world for
20 years or more and has been used by
doctors specifically to abort children.
That is why Depo-Provera was not
approved in the U.S. until recently. It
has the usual progestin mechanisms of
action as the Pill: suppressing
ovulation in some cases; altering the
mucus in the cervix; or altering the
endometrium, the lining of the uterus.”12
Depo-Provera may cause abortions 40 to
60% of the time.13
Norplant
Norplant is also a progesterone drug
which is becoming increasingly popular
despite its significant risks and
difficulty of removal. (As of August
1996, in Texas alone, over 68 federal
lawsuits against its manufacturer,
Wyeth-Ayerst Laboratories, have been
consolidated.) The drug is encased in 5
or 6 flexible capsules or rods, which
are surgically implanted beneath the
skin on the inside of the upper arm, and
is designed to be effective for up to
five years. Pregnancy is avoided through
suppressed ovulation or aborted due to
failed implantation of the baby. Studies
show that it may cause abortions 50 to
65% of the time.14
Emergency Contraception
(Morning-After Pill)
Emergency Contraception is one brand
of the Pill. Preven is the only type
approved by the FDA as of spring 1999.
It is manufactured in higher dosages (up
to 8 times the normal dose), and
packaged and marketed specifically for
after intercourse use. Preven is
designed to be taken up to 72 hours
after sexual intercourse and still be
effective. Like all oral products,
Preven can and does prevent implantation
of an embryo and is therefore
abortifacient.
Alternatives
For the married couple, Natural
Family Planning (NFP) provides a
medically safe, healthy, highly
effective and very low-cost method of
planning your family. For more
information on NFP, contact the Couple
to Couple League at (513) 471-2000. For
the unmarried couple, abstinence is
recommended.
- Lawrence Roberge, The
Cost of Abortion, La Grange, GA: Four Winds, 1995, pg. 7
- Colker R. (Feb. 6,
1992). Louisiana abortion is a very real threat to women The
Dallas Morning News, 23A.
- The Pill: How does it
work? Is it safe?, Couple to Couple League Int’l Inc., (513)
471-2000, (1993), pp. 2-3 and Ehmann, Dr. Rudolf. Abortifacient
Contraception: the Pharmaceutical Holocaust, Human Life
Int’l., (540) 635-7884, (1993), p. 1.
- Bronson RA (Sept.
1981). Oral contraception: mechanism of action. Clin Ob Gyn 24
(3) 873-874.
- Hatcher RA (1988) 192.
- J. Richard Crout
quoted in the FDA Consumer, HEW pub. no. 76-3024,
reprinted from May, 1976
- Russ Wilks quoted in
a United Press International release carried in the Cincinnati
Post, Jan. 11, 1973
- Federal
Register, loc., cit.
- The Birth Control
Game: Gambling with Life, American Life League/Pharmacists for Life,
(866) 538-5483, (1990), p. 2
- American Medical
Association Committee on Human Reproduction, “Evaluation of
intrauterine contraceptive devices,” Journal of the
American Medical Association, 199:9, Feb. 27, 1967, 155
- Thomas W. Hilgers,
“The intrauterine device: contraceptive or
abortifacient?” Minnesota Medicine, June
1974, 493-501
- Bogomir Kuhar, Infant
Homicides Through Contraceptives, Eternal Life Publishing,
1995
- Ibid., p. 28
- Ibid., pp. 28-29
| | |
|
|
Pregnant and Scared?
Call the confidential
Option Line 24/7
to speak with a counselor
who cares.
1-800-395-HELP (4357) | |